After looking back at the events that shaped and defined
2011, a follow-up post on previewing 2012 ought to have been natural
progression. But considering the way that the US Dollar has defied all economic
theories in 2011, I think it deserves to be the focal point of 2012’s first
post.
Background
In August 2011, for the 1st time in history, rating agency
Standard & Poor’s downgraded the long term rating of the United States of
America from AAA to AA+ on the back of “Political Risk and Rising Debt Burden” and
maintained the “Negative Outlook” which they had announced earlier in April. The
announcement came 3 days after the US Congress voted to raise the Debt Ceiling
of the Federal Government by the means of Budget Control Act 2011. This flag of
caution was mostly ignored as the other 2 major rating agencies (Moody’s and
Fitch) maintained their superlative ratings. However, Moody’s had lowered its
outlook to negative in June, and Fitch too did the same later in November. The
S&P had already lowered their outlook earlier in April, sending the Dollar
to a 3-year low within a couple of weeks.
The blame game started practically immediately after the
announcement. President Barack Obama blamed the Bush Tax-Cuts (which he had
actually extended). The Republicans blamed the liberal Democrats for out-of-control
entitlement spending, and demanded Obama to seek US Treasury Secretary Timothy
Geithner’s resignation. Meanwhile the Democrats blamed the Tea Party Movement
for provoking the idea of US Defaulting on their Debt. The Independents blamed
everybody.
But then...
It was not the 1st time that the USA’s National Debt had formed
headlines. Since the 2007-08 Crisis, America’s economic recovery had not exactly
been remarkable; neither had they drastically reduce their debt. In fact, at
over $ 15 Trillion, the US Debt is already 100% of the GDP. Also, at sub-2% GDP
growth, economic rebound has been abysmal. And yet, the US Dollar has shown
tremendous resilience, and surprisingly perceived by investors as the safest
haven for their money. This is not because the USA did something right, but
because the rest of the world, chiefly Europe, got several things wrong. And when
talks of Greece defaulting on their debt, and Europe going into a recession
surfaced, it was the panic among risk-averse investors that drove them back into
the Dollar. Now brokerages and some pundits are suggesting that the trend could
continue and the Dollar could dominate most of 2012. However, I am still not
convinced about the prospects of the Dollar, and once again, would prefer to
take a contrarian stance. Let me throw some light on the dynamics that give
method to my madness.
A strong US Dollar actually hurts export growth thereby expanding
the trade deficit. This is bad news as it hurts American competitiveness in the
modern age where, thanks to globalization, consumers have the choice to buy
Asian, European or American products. This is the last thing America needs as
its economic recovery struggles to gain momentum. This is the reason why the US
and Europe have been so vocal about the Chinese Yuan being artificially
undervalued apparently. More recently, the US Treasury even criticized Japan
for trying to weaken the Yen. So it’s fair to say that the US Treasury is
closely monitoring the impact of a stronger Dollar.
If there was one single most influential event that
triggered the flight to the Dollar, it would have to be the Euro-zone’s
Sovereign Debt debacle. To summarize the entire EU shipwreck in a jiffy, it was
simply a case of too much reckless spending by Greece, funded by debt (as it
always is), mostly issued by France and Germany. Since participation in the EU
required fiscal and monetary discipline, the Greek government kept this
mountain of debt a secret, and misreported the nation’s official economic
statistics, until the truth finally emerged in 2010. This was the point where
the concerns regarding a sovereign debt crisis in Europe, especially the PIIGS
(Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain) got louder, and the markets
started losing confidence. Hence as the sentiments in Europe got jittery, because
of disappointing bond auctions in August, and then Greek bondholders having to
take a haircut in October, investors flocked to the Dollar for Capital
Conservation.
However, by the time 2012 draws to an end, two
possible scenarios could transpire: (a) the Euro-zone resolves their problems
and has a concrete plan of action in place (perhaps over-optimistic) or (b) the
European Union could either dissolve or expel the troubled nations (most
possibly Greece). But the truth is that both those scenarios are extremes and
unlikely to materialize. But either way, the one thing that is certain is that the
Dollar will see an exodus of capital flowing into either a resurged Euro or a
successor to the Euro (especially with Germany’s backing) in the 2nd half of
2012.
The Euro-zone troubles led to some resurgence in the US
Dollar. But in the grand scheme of things, there has been a secular shift away
from the dollar – both as a reserve currency as well as a trading currency.
These are the two essential roles that the Dollar plays in the modern, globally
entwined economy, and with those roles reduced, the Dollar will surely lose its
supremacy. Let’s take a closer look at what’s happening on these fronts,
starting with the USD as a reserve currency. China and Japan are the largest
holders of US Treasury Debt (Look at the figure for USA’s foreign creditors). As
of August 2011, over 60% of China’s $ 3.2 Trillion foreign exchange reserves
were denominated in US dollars (including $1.1Tn in US Treasury Bonds).
However, according to Standard Chartered Bank, while China’s reserves grew by
$200bn in the 1st four months of 2011, 75% of this comprised of non-dollar
denominated assets. China also bought Euros in 2011 in the form of sovereign
debt from countries like Germany, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Hungary,
thereby adding to their previous European holdings. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao
declared that as long as Europe is serious about resolving its issues, China
would continue to help financially. In addition to purchasing sovereign bonds,
Chinese investments in European corporations too have grown phenomenally as
they bought corporate bonds worth $72bn in the 1st half 2011 alone.
And that’s not all. China has steadily been accumulating Gold
reserves too. While its Gold holdings are only 1/8th of America’s, it’s
steadily rising. China’s share of global Gold demand has tripled in the last
decade from 6% in 2000 to 18% in 2010. And considering it is still only the 6th
largest holder in the world with 1,054 tones, which accounts for less than 2%
of its total reserves, it is expected that China’s hunger for this yellow metal
is all set to rise. China’s not alone in the Gold rush. Other countries too
bought gold in 2011 in an attempt to diversify their reserves. South Korea
bought 40 tonnes, Mexico 98 tonnes, Russia 63 tonnes and Thailand bought 53
tonnes. Other countries that added gold to their national reserves include
Columbia, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela. India’s central bank RBI made an
early move, buying 200 tonnes in October 2009 from the IMF. Furthermore, according
to estimates from World Gold Council, Indian households bought another 1,059
tonnes of gold between Sept2010 and Sept 2011, taking the aggregate Indian household
holdings to 18,000 tonnes. The 2 illustrations below show which countries have
the largest gold reserves, and how much does gold account for.
China and India aren’t the only ones diversifying their reserves earnestly.
Japan too has been following suit as its Finance Minister Jun Azum raised
concerns about Japan’s $1.3 Trillion foreign reserves being dominated by US
dollar denominated assets. In December 2011, when Japanese Prime Minister
Yoshihiko Noda visited China, he announced buying Yuan Bonds worth $10 billion,
and also agreed to use Yuan for bilateral trade with China. Furthermore, it also
entered into a $15bn currency swap agreement with India recently. The agreement
would give India 15 billion dollars to meet its short-term liquidity needs, and
Japan would get Indian Rupees to trade with India directly and diversifying reserves
at the same time.
China has made it no attempt to hide its ambitions of the Yuan
replacing the Dollar as the world’s next reserve currency, and is not only
slowly expanding Chinese bond markets, but also making bilateral trade
agreements especially with its Asian partners, promoting Yuan denominated trade.
It is expected that as the Hong Kong based Dim Sum Bond Market grows in
market-capitalization (current m-cap is 35 billion), more countries &
corporations will take notice and participate. Already having signed deals with
Thailand, Japan and Pakistan in 2011, China is now well on its way to
materialize its plans of signing an agreement with the 10-member Association of
South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) to settle bilateral trade in the Yuan. The
trading bloc is collectively China’s 3rd largest trading partner, and promoting
Yuan settlement with them would be a major step in the dragon nation’s long
term campaign to make its currency widely-used beyond its own borders, and take
up a bigger role on a global stage. According to the Wall Street Journal, the
Yuan accounted for less than 1% of China’s trade in 2010, but that number rose
to more than 10% in 2011 and is expected to rise to 15% of the total trade in
2012 according to estimates from Deutsche Bank. China has been doing this (signing
currency swaps to facilitate Yuan denominated bilateral trade) since the crisis
period of 2008. In the graphic below, I highlighted the nations that China has
signed such deals only in the last 2 years. As expected, the countries with
closer geographical proximity have already been taken on board, and it would be
little surprise that within another 2 years, more nations will follow suit, and
this graphic will have more shades of red. Hence, in this backdrop, one would
have to be very sanguine to maintain a rosy outlook of the dollar.
Case for the Dollar
Having said all the above, it would be very naïve to write
the US off so easily. A strong US Dollar does provide some benefits too. 1st of
all, cheaper imports could help boost consumption in America. This rationale
often attracts criticism that “Made in China” goods are the root cause of the
USA’s deficit, but if an economic paper released by Federal Reserve Bank of SanFrancisco is of any merit, then that criticism is flawed because 85% of every
Dollar spent by Americans on products “Made in China” benefits America, while
China only gets 15% of the benefits. How? This is because the actual cost of
production of those goods is under 15% of the final price that the consumers
are charged, and the rest of the costs come from services such as
transportation, logistics, retailing, marketing, etc. which are all done within
America. However, since the masses do not realize this when they see a “Made in
China” label on their goods, and also since 2012 is an election year, one
should expect Washington to make politically popular decisions at the expense
of prudent economic ones (call it if you want, business as usual).
Some people aren’t as cynical as myself and believe that the
USD is indeed the safest best. Investment bank Morgan Stanley recently called the
US the “best safe haven “and forecasted that the USD will get stronger in 2012
as deleveraging will cause balance sheets to shrink not only in Europe but
around the world. According to another investment bank UBS, US fund managers,
who collectively hold $40 trillion in US Dollar assets, and are 1 of the 3
largest holders of the US dollar (other 2 groups being sovereign wealth funds,
and foreign central banks), have now stopped diversifying their portfolios.
They are now planning on repatriating funds if the US equity markets continue
to out-perform its peers.
Albeit at the expense of exporters, a stronger dollar
benefits the consumers at some levels as it makes their imported discretionary
expenditure items cheaper. However core expenses such as food and housing
remain unaffected. Furthermore, cheaper imported raw materials are also a boon
as it lowers input costs of production. However, this may not be useful at a
time when business confidence and capital expenditure are low, and unsold
inventories are already quite high. It should be noted that another implication
of cheaper imports is that the country’s trade deficit widens. So I personally
think that a stronger dollar, while benefits consumers at some levels, actually
hurts the economic productivity of the country. Some companies would relocate
their manufacturing base overseas to gain from lower labor costs and cheaper
raw materials thereby maintaining healthy margins. This relocating however causes
job loss in America (and no jobs means no income, which means no discretionary
expenditure, which makes the cheaper imports fruitless).
Finally, a stronger dollar gives the US an opportunity to
pay off some of its national debts at a favorable exchange rate. However, this
opportunity comes at a time when conflicting political beliefs may make it
impossible to make the most of it. As we all know, 2012 is an election year for
the US, and any decision made by the Obama Administration, whether good or bad,
will be shredded by the Republicans in the Senate, much like they rejected the
American Jobs Act a few months ago.
So to conclude, while many pundits are getting bullish on
the dollar, I want you to base your own stance on secular, longer-term trends and
filter the short-term hullabaloo. And that secular trend is pointing towards a
shift of economic power from the West to the East, and there is no better
manifestation of this than the descent of the greenback.
No comments:
Post a Comment